Haddon Willmer contributes to the current discussion in the Church on Community Action…

Haddon head (1172x971)In his article,  Stepping Out – Community and Social Action  (Moortown Baptist News 13 February 2015) Graham says that one of several things we need to do as a Church is ‘to develop the level of support, prayer and recognition for the individual witness, work and service of people at Moortown Baptist Church. These expressions are a vital calling in themselves.’

How could this be done?  

First, we need to recognise that the primary and constant form of Church engagement in society is what the members of the church community do every day of the week.

That amounts to far more time than can ever be given to activities run directly by the church.

It involves everybody in the church whether they choose it or not. We are all deeply, intimately, involved in ‘society’ in many different ways.

To recognise it we need to look into it – to ask questions together about it.

The first step would be to  take note of where the Church is in society through its members as dispersed during the week.

That could be done through a fun ‘getting to know one another in a new way’  exercise –  even by a bit of a party.

Here are some questions we could ask ourselves, and each other:

Where do you work? What are you responsible for in the world outside Church? From where you are,  how do you see society, its blessings, its potential and problems? Do you think you are useful  to God and to people through your daily work, or are you an ineffective bystander or just a victim of a society that doesn’t work well for the common good? Are you part of a team, doing something good or useful?

Don’t  say, I am a pensioner, I don’t work.   Pensioners don’t get paid, but like the stay-at home Mum, they work voluntarily and often very hard at humanly constructive and essential jobs.   And they have a distinctive and valuable understanding of ‘society’ coming from their experience.

Where do you live? Who are your  neighbours? What do you do for and with them? What do you care about in your small and larger neighbourhoods? What good do you do? What good do you receive?  What do you learn about living socially in our world as it is today?

What family do you live with or see often? How do different family members experience living in their corner of society? What does the experience of your spouse, your children, your parents show you about the potential and the problems of society?

By asking questions like this, we could build up a picture and a map of  the church we are, in this society now.  And, once we have the facts, we could move on to evaluation.

What do we see and understand about society because of our involvement in it? What is sad, frustrating, a challenge for change?   What good is already being done, and how could more be done?

Who are we, not as private persons, but as social beings and citizens? What am I, not in and for myself, but in the eyes and experience of others, (family members, neighbours, employers, clients, strangers,  even organisations)?    Am I valued for worthwhile service, or am I seen as a nuisance, a parasite, even a menace?

What allies and helpers do we find in doing good, and what blockages and negative neighbours?   How can we make better alliances and turn negatives into positives?  How do we keep going even when negatives persist powerfully?

Recognising ourselves as persons and as Christians who are inevitably socially involved, and evaluating our involvement is not an individual private exercise. It is not introspective narcissism. It is something we can and should do as Church together.  

We can and should  both appreciate and encourage one another in our present engagements. We can learn more about the reality of society  by finding out how others see and experience it. (I have a comfortable individual existence; through people around me, I know life is hard, and society a cruel, clumsy, unhelpful thing. It is other people  who give me an agenda for social engagement, who tell me there is something more to live for than my own personal fulfilment.) If we talk honestly, we can help one another to evaluate whether what we are doing in life in society  is right and worthwhile, or whether it would be better to change to doing something else. We can help each other through times of weakness, discouragement, perplexity and even disastrous mistakes and failures (which are quite likely for people living in the real world and trying to make a good difference).

So we can practise Hebrews 10.24,25: Consider how to stir  up one another  to love and good works, not neglecting to meet together…’     We will do more than encourage each other to do good works as individuals, as though we live in isolation. We meet together to do the stirring, and in our meeting together we discover good works to do together. And  it will go further: when we meet each other in church, as Christians who are citizens, responsible to God for the welfare of the city (the global world) where God has placed us, we will stir each other up politically.   For if we hear the cry of the needy world and want to do something to help, we will want to recruit all available resources, including the government, the economy, culture. There will be no cordon sanitaire, no fire-break, between our being Christian and our being citizens. That means, we won’t as Church, live through this election season as though there is nothing in it which should concern us.

If  we, as Church, work like this, we will learn from the inside  how our faith and obedience to God in Christ really works out in everyday life. We will have a realistic faith, which gets a degree of living visibility in society because it is rooted in practice, and is not just words (which is what we necessarily deal in in our meetings in church). We will be discovering faith in ways that can be communicated to other people more adequately, because we are doing things in the same world as other people, and doing them in such a way that the faith and life of Christ has body, as well as spirit. So it becomes accessible to people who want that kind of practical everyday reality. Our life of faith will not be an individual cultivation of spirituality, but a social life, where the society which is other people and Jesus Christ, the first-born amongst many brethren.

So we learn and deepen our faith in Christ through our engagement in society rather than trying to intensify our spiritual life in Church and occasionally have a bit of a social add-on. We get going, not by sitting in church asking ourselves how we can engage more in society, but by recognising seriously that we are already engaged in society. We are with God in Christ in the world, which is where God’s love takes him.

 

 

 

Fantastic Acts: Haddon Wilmer shares his thoughts on Riding Lights’ journey through the Book of Acts

DSC_0494 (1600x1071)The play was fun: clownish, witty, satiric by turns. But we did not laugh much, because it had us working out where the play was going, what was being said, and how we should respond to its challenge.

DSC_0469 (1600x1071)The play is a funny way of reading Acts – could we take it as a model for our groups? Three people on holiday…  Julia the assistant minister in a Church, busy and keen, but frustrated with it all; Chris her younger brother, an actor, cynical about Church and faith, not least because he has been reacting for years against his bossy sister, with her ‘saintly’ status’; he does not like being called ‘gofer’; and Tony, an historian, an enthusiastic reader of Acts, and guide books about historical places, and distraught because his wife has got fed up and left him.

They do the usual things, sun too much, drink too much, argue and apologise – and for the whole week, they do a very unusual thing. They dip into the book of Acts, and they act it out – it is not only Chris who can improvise.

DSC_0472 (1600x1136)They don’t act it to make the past present, as in a historical costume drama; they let the story tell itself in the idioms of contemporary living. So the disciples don’t walk from Jerusalem to Emmaus (Luke 24), they ride in a car, with a Frisbee as the steering wheel, and Jesus is an unknown hitchhiker they pick up. They lend themselves as a medium for the story to tell itself again. Does the story do that, or does it get lost in the fun?

The play states the problem:  Our Church today is not like the first century Church we hear about in the book of Acts in the New Testament. A lame man lay helplessly begging at the Temple gate every day. Peter said to him: I don’t have any silver and gold, but what I have, I give: In the name of Jesus, rise and walk (Acts 3). The man started dancing. In the play, the lame man holds out his hand, croaking his request:  ‘Miracle’. He asks for what he really wants, the restoration of capacity for a full, free life. Julia says to him: ‘I can’t do miracles but what I have, I give you’. She puts some coins in his hand; he throws them back at her.

DSC_0479 (1600x1071)The play encounters the mystery in Acts: the surprise of Holy Spirit, the free God beyond our management. Here, we cannot describe or control: we must wait for the Spirit, let ourselves be contradicted and converted and carried by the Spirit.

Philip in Samaria was like Julia, busy running a big and lively church, and then the Holy Spirit told him to get on the road in the desert where there was nobody (Acts 8). He obeyed, though it seemed a stupid career move.  And there he met the eunuch, travelling back to Queen Candace’s court in Ethiopia, reading the prophet Isaiah but not understanding it. When Philip explained it, he believed in Jesus and was baptised, and went on his way rejoicing. And so Christian faith very early was taken to Africa – the Spirit gets unlikely things done.

Acts tells how the first Christians came to see that the God who came to them in Jesus is the God of all peoples of the earth; and so Christians must be able to break through all the high walls that divide people from each other. So the play tells the story of the ‘second most significant meal’ in the Bible (the first is, of course, the Lord’s Supper). Christians are not different from other people: we love our own high walls, treasuring our identity and security. And Christian leaders may have a special investment in keeping the walls high. Conversion is necessary; and conversion is hard to come by.

DSC_0498 (1600x1071)So it was for Peter, the faithful Jew (Acts 10). Peter is hungry, sleeping on the roof in the heat of the day, and in his dream, he sees a sheet comes down from heaven – and, horror! – it is full of unclean creatures (according to the rules in Leviticus 11, including for example, the horse, the pig and the ostrich). Yet the chef says: Come, Peter, kill and eat. Peter will not: I have never eaten anything unclean. The chef is angry as chefs can be: No one calls my food unclean. Eventually Peter does what he is told. He crosses the boundary and eats, and thus is made ready to go to Cornelius when that Gentile soldier wants Peter the Jew to share the way of Jesus with him and his people.

DSC_0470 (1600x1071)As the play comes towards its end, the theme of reconciling welcome across the deepest divides is expressed in two ways. In Acts, Paul comes to Rome, where he lives in his hired house for two years, welcoming all who come to him, Jew and Gentile, ‘preaching the kingdom of God and teaching about the Lord Jesus Christ, quite openly and unhindered’ (Acts 28. 31). Acts is an artful literary work, deliberately given an ending which is open, wrapping nothing up. It leaves its readers to carry on the story. And in the play, there is a movement of reconciliation for the three people, as they break bread and drink wine on the beach. Chris is still sceptical, but he will not be left out when the bread is given, he will eat with the others knowing what he is doing. Tony has a message on his phone from his wife, asking if he is open to having a conversation, since she has been having second thoughts about breaking up; and Julia, in an extraordinary crisis of penitence, breaks down and cannot drink the wine, because she does not respect and love her companions on holiday and so does not help them to be respectful to her  (I would like to have the script – I cannot remember the actual words here, and they are vital, as the play is so sensitively and precisely phrased throughout).

DSC_0486 (1600x1071)There are too many good things in the play than I can mention here. The puppet jailer in Philippi is fun (Acts 16). Cutting is the scene where the Christians pray for Peter in prison; they are so pious, unbelieving, unexpectant, engrossed in their religious exercises that they don’t have the free intelligence to hear Peter banging at their door, but are rather annoyed at their useless prayers being disturbed.

I can’t omit the remarkable conflation of Acts 2 and Acts 28. Near the end of the evening we are taken back to the beginning of Acts, the day of Pentecost, not mentioned before. The secluded frightened disciples in the upper room are shaken with earthquake, wind blowing, and tongues of flame descending; and then it morphs into the storm which broke the ship Paul and Luke with 274 others and cast them up on the island of Malta, where they were welcomed by the people.

20141013_184653 - Copy (1600x1128)The picture above shows the cast of Fantastic Acts (left to right) John Holden-White, Edith Kirkwood and Daniel Starkie who are accompanied on this seven week tour by Technical expert Dave Robinson.

The Riding Lights Theatre Company is based at the Friargate Theatre in York. Each year it tours extensively giving over 500 performances, runs a Summer School, publishes books, sketches and plays and runs workshops in schools, theatres, village halls and even prisons.

There are many ways we can support the Riding Lights Theatre Company but probably the most effective is to become a member. “Members” it says in the Fantastic Acts programme,”are our lifeblood, making possible the work we do, across the UK, every year”.  To see a full list of tour venues or to find out more about Membership you can call 01904 655317, email info@rltc.org or visit the Company’s website at www.ridinglights.org

To view a larger version of any of our gallery pictures simply click on the image.

Haddon Wilmer invites us to reflect on a sermon he heard preached on holiday in Shetland

On holiday in Shetland, we enjoyed better weather than Leeds.  On Sunday we walked  from  the guest house, along the beach, past the blue and red houses and came to Lerwick  Baptist Church an attractive serviceable building with very friendly people in it.

Shetland

The Church is looking for a new minister.  The sermon was preached by Aubrey Jamieson, below, Superintendent of the Fishermen’s Mission in Lerwick – fishing is a big and dangerous industry in Shetland. It was about Baptism and because it was clear, informative, and challenging I wanted to pass it on to my friends.  Like me, you may not agree with everything in it, but it is worth taking very seriously. So here is the slightly abbreviated text which Aubrey has given us.

Baptism

missionfunds-w960-h600Over the summer Moraig and I have been meeting with the three baptismal candidates and thinking together of what Baptism means and what is involved.

I want to use what we have been studying as a basis for our thoughts this morning looking at Baptism under four main headings. Why be Baptised? What does Baptism mean? What happens when we are Baptised? And finally Who is Baptism for?

So then – Why be Baptised?

Firstly and fundamentally, because Jesus commands us. When He was about to ascend to His Father he said in what has become known as the Great Commission – Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.

It’s as simple as that. Jesus commands us to be baptised. Because Baptism is not about feelings. There are those who would say –‘I don’t feel the need to be baptised’ or ‘I don’t feel it’s the right time’.

But if we belong to Jesus, if we claim to be His disciple, if we are seeking to follow Him then we must take the challenge of Baptism seriously.

A phrase I often heard growing up in the church was ‘Baptism is not essential for salvation but it is essential for obedience’.

Jesus said to His disciples in John 15 v 14 – You are my friends if you do what I command you.

If we claim to be His followers, if our desire is to be obedient to Him we need to take seriously the command to be baptised.

But Jesus not only commanded us, He also set an example. We read in Matthew’s gospel and chapter three of how Jesus came to John at the Jordan to be baptised. John at first was reluctant saying –‘I need to be baptised by You and do You come to me?

But Jesus replied in verse 15 – Let it be so now: it is proper for us to do this to fulfil all righteousness. So John consented.

And verses 16 & 17 tell us what happened – As soon as Jesus was baptised, He went up out of the water. At that moment heaven was opened and He saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lightening on Him. And a voice from Heaven said – This is my Son whom I love, with Him I am well pleased.

This was the first of three occasions when the Father spoke from heaven, the other occasions being at the Transfiguration and as He spoke in John chapter 12 of His death.

This in itself showing that Jesus was perfectly in the Father’s will.

In one sense Jesus had no need to be baptised. He had nothing to repent of. He was the sinlessly perfect Son of God. The prophet Isaiah reminds us that – He committed no violence nor was there any deceit found in His mouth. But Jesus knew that in taking this step He was submitting Himself to the will of God.

Shetland 2Jesus did not submit to Baptism with a view to washing away His sins. Rather in His baptism he took His first step towards the cross by identifying with us in our sinfulness.

In contrast when we are baptised, we as repentant sinners are identifying with Jesus in His sinlessness.

But like Jesus, when we are baptised we are doing what God requires. We are doing what pleases Him.

Jesus commands it. Jesus set us a wonderful example. But notice also we have the example of the early church.

Because in the early church Baptism was not an optional add on to be considered at a later date if at all. No, it was a fundamental part of the process of becoming a Christian.

Right back on the day of Pentecost Peter declared in Acts 2 v 38 –Repent and be baptised every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ so that your  sins may be forgiven, and You will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

As we look through the book of Acts we find numerous references to Baptism.

In Acts 8 v 12 we find Philip the evangelist baptising believers in Samaria. And then later in the chapter the Ethiopian official was led to Christ by Philip and was baptised.

After his dramatic encounter with Jesus on the Damascus road the Apostle Paul was baptised by Ananias in chapter 9 v 19.

The Roman centurion Cornelius and his non Jewish friends were baptised by Peter in Acts 10 v 48.

When we turn to chapter 16 we find Lydia the business woman believing and being baptised by Paul. And later in the chapter after a dramatic series of events he baptised the Philippian jailer and all his household.

In chapter 19 Paul baptised some disciples of John in Ephesus.

The evidence of Scripture would suggest that in the early church there was no such thing as an unbaptised believer.

When it comes to baptism there are those who would perhaps think that it’s just the Baptists doing their thing.

But when we turn to the Word of God we find that Christ commanded it, that He showed us by example and that the early church practised it. For them baptism was an integral part of the Christian life. It was a given. It was an essential.

Secondly, what does Baptism mean?

It means that we belong to Jesus. It is a dramatic way of declaring that we belong to Him.

Someone has suggested that the only prop required is a large quantity of water. Because the Greek word ‘baptizo’ from where we get the English word ‘to baptise’ means to dip or to immerse. Even in non-Christian literature the word means, ‘to plunge, sink, drench or overwhelm’.

So the word baptism implies in itself a large quantity of water rather than a few drops in a basin.

In the early church baptisms most likely took place in rivers, lakes or pools as they still do in many places today. Indeed three or four years ago when we ourselves were between buildings and meeting in the Community hall on two occasions baptisms were held at the Sands of Sound beach.

Many churches of course now have baptistries as we do. The congregation are asked to imagine that the water is like a grave.

So when we are baptised we identify ourselves with our Lord Jesus who died and was buried for us. For a second we will disappear, like Jesus off the face of the earth.

The most common method of baptism is to be taken backwards into the horizontal position signifying death and the grave.

Then like Jesus we symbolically rise from the dead.  Paul in his letter to the Colossians speaks in chapter 2 and verse 12 about having been buried with Him in Baptism and raised with Him through your faith in the power of God, who raised Him from the dead.

It has been described as an outward symbol of an inward experience.

So when we are baptised we are in effect saying- ‘Lord, you died and were buried for me, Lord you rose again for me. I identify myself with you in your death, burial and resurrection. I belong to You.’Map 2We belong to Jesus and we will also live for Jesus. Paul speaking to the Romans in chapter 6 of his great epistle in verses 3, 4 says – Don’t you know that all of us who were baptised into Christ Jesus were baptised into His death?   We were therefore buried with Him through Baptism into death in order that just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life.

Baptism is more than a dramatic statement of belief, it is much more than simply a one-off event, far more than just ticking a box.

Paul describes it as rising to live a new life.  So it has great implications as to how we live, our thoughts, our attitudes, our actions indeed all of our lives.

When Paul was giving the Colossians rules for holy in Chapter 3 of his epistle he says in verse 3 –For you died and your life is now hidden with Christ in God.

I read a story of two young women who having previously lived a very wild and riotous lifestyle were converted and came to faith in Christ.

Sometime later they received an invitation to one of the wild parties they would formerly have attended. The reply they put back was – ‘We are unable to come because we recently died’.

It may seem an amusing story but nevertheless it portrays a deep and vital spiritual truth.

As we go into the water we declare our resolve to die to our old way of living and we rise out of the water we are declaring our desire to live for Christ and follow His pattern of living.

We are having done with the old and grasping on to the new. If any man be in Christ the old has gone and the new has come. And baptism is a powerful demonstration of this.

It is in fact no exaggeration to say that baptism is a revolutionary act.  It is a declaration that, come what may – I will live for Jesus. As the Apostle said – For me to live is Christ.

We belong to Jesus, we will live for Jesus and we are also made clean by Jesus.

When Paul was telling the story of his conversion to the crowd in Jerusalem in Acts chapter 22 he relays the words of Ananias in verse 16 – And now what are you waiting for? Get up, be baptised and wash your sins away, calling on His name.

The baptistry does not only symbolize a great watery grave but also a bath, a place where symbolically our sins are washed away.

Of course no water on the body can ever wash away sin but rather our faith in Jesus is expressed in baptism.

Peter spoke of this in his first epistle chapter 3. He was speaking of how Noah and his family were saved as it were by water. The water buried the earth in judgement but they also lifted Noah and his family up to safety.

But although Peter says in verse 21 – this water symbolises baptism that now saves you also –he goes on to clarify when he adds – not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a good conscience towards God. It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Of course only the blood of Jesus can cleanse us from all sin. Baptism is a sign that we are made clean by Jesus.

Sometimes we come across people who perhaps came to faith a long time ago yet they delay their baptism on the grounds that they are not yet good enough for God. They look on Baptism as if it was some special sign of Christian maturity.

But in many ways the reverse should be the case. Because it is in Baptism that we acknowledge that we are not good enough, that we constantly stand in need of Christ’s cleansing. Because baptism is for sinners, albeit those who have repented. Baptism is a sign that we are made clean by Jesus.

What does baptism mean?  It means we belong to Jesus. It means we intend to live for Jesus. It means we have been made clean by Jesus.

Thirdly What happens in Baptism? Firstly we confess that Jesus is Lord. Romans 10 v9 – If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead you will be saved.

Paul writing to his young co-worker Timothy exhorts him in chapter 6 verse 12 to Take hold of the eternal life to which you were called and for which you made the good confession in the presence of many witnesses.

When did Timothy make this good confession before many witnesses?   Probably when he was baptised.

Because Baptism is a great moment of nailing your colours to the mast. It is declaring that we belong to Jesus. We proclaim whose we are and whom we serve.

Experience has shown time and time again that the very act of baptism forms a tremendous opportunity for the gospel. As candidates confess their faith in Christ and proclaim their allegiance to Him it is a very powerful witness to those who come into the service.

Those of you who have been in church a while can no doubt recall that some of the most powerful, the most moving and the most challenging services you have ever attended have been services of believer’s baptism.

As the candidate confesses and then witnesses to that confession through the waters of baptism something very powerful takes place and others, even non- believers take note. What happens in baptism? We confess Jesus as Lord.

And then God blesses us with His spirit. When we give ourselves to Christ God blesses us with the gift of His Spirit. Through His Spirit He comes to live in us and becomes the source of our new life, a life marked by a new power, a new peace and a new joy. Baptism is a sign of the presence of God’s Spirit.

Some would say that baptism is more than just a sign of the Holy Spirit’s presence. And there are texts which would seem to suggest that the Spirit is active in and through the rite of Baptism. Peter’s appeal on the day of Pentecost in Acts 2 v 38 was –Repent and be baptised everyone of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

Baptism taken from this perspective is like a believer’s personal Pentecost.

logoHowever we believe that God’s Spirit is given at the time of conversion and is not bound by any ceremony. When we read the story of Cornelius and his friends in Acts chapter 10 we find that they were baptised after God had poured out His Spirit upon them. Their baptism was a sign that this had already taken place – an outward sign of an inward grace, if you like.

But one thing we can be very sure of is that God will bless the act of obedience by a fresh infilling with His Spirit. I said to the candidates as we met with them, they could be absolutely sure that God will bless them in the stand that they are taking.

However nervous they might feel beforehand, I know that when they take their stand of obedience and follow Him in His appointed way that God will bless them with His Spirit.

When you are coming forward for baptism you can look to God to bless you and I can testify like so many others in this room that You will not be disappointed.

In Baptism we also become members of His church. In Galatians 3 v 26, 27 we read – In Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith. As many of You are were baptised into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female, for all of you are one in Christ Jesus.

Paul’s mention of ‘faith’ leads him on to speak about baptism which in turn leads him to speak on the church in which we are all one in Christ Jesus. Baptism is God’s way for us to join the church, the body of Christ.

Because when we are baptised we identify ourselves not only with Jesus but also with His people. The New Testament knows nothing of baptised ‘lone rangers’.

Paul says in 1 Corinthians 12 v 13 –For we were all baptised by one Spirit into one body-whether Jews or Greeks, slave or free and we were all given the one Spirit to drink.

That is why in most Baptist churches, baptism and church membership are closely linked. Through Baptism we become members of the church of Jesus. And we give expression to this as we become members of our local fellowship. It’s the natural next step.

Some churches would actually refuse to baptise if the candidate is not also requesting membership. We would not go as far as that, recognising that sometimes people come to us from other Christian denominations that do not practise believer’s baptism, feeling challenged about it.

We would want to help them in their desire to be obedient to Christ recognising that they may continue to be identified with their local body of believers.

The main point being is that we are involved with a local expression of the body of Christ. That we identify ourselves with a bible believing local church.

But sometimes, even with our own people, those who have come to faith through the witness of the fellowship here, it would seem that there are artificially long gaps between coming forward for baptism and joining the church.

The New Testament model would seem to be –that they were baptised and added to the church. Perhaps we have inadvertently created artificial borders here. In the early church Baptism was the rite of passage into church membership. They believed, were baptised then they belonged.

Shetland 3Because when we are born again of God’s spirit we belong to each other. And that has great implications as to how we behave, how we act one towards another.

In Philippians 2 v 4 Paul says – Each of you should look not only to his own interests but also to the interests of others.

In Romans 12 v 13 we are reminded to share with God’s people who are in need and practice hospitality.

These are but examples of so much of the New Testament’s teaching about our corporate life together.

When we belong to Christ we also belong to one another, we are members of His body. And baptism is a powerful expression of this.

Fourthly, who is Baptism for?

The bible makes it very clear that Baptism is for believers. That faith is absolutely central to Baptism.

In Acts chapter 8 we find the story of Philip and the Ethiopian Eunuch and of how Philip came alongside him and explained the scriptures to him.

In verse 36 the Eunuch exclaimed –Look here is water, why shouldn’t I be baptised?

Philips answer in verse 37 was very clear – If you believe with all your heart you may. The official answered – I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.

The only prerequisite to baptism is faith in Christ. Because without faith baptism will be of no effect. It will be completely meaningless, it can do absolutely nothing for us.

My Dad in law used to say – ‘If you baptise an unbeliever you only make them wet’’. It can do nothing else for them.

Baptism must be accompanied by faith or it is not the baptism of the bible.

This throws up some difficulties for those who come to faith in Christ who were perhaps sprinkled as infants. In their words –Should they be baptised again?

There are those who cite the references to whole families or entire households believing and being baptised as evidence that young children must have been included.

But to assume that very young children were included is perhaps to read too much into the silence of scripture which is dangerous, when scripture is elsewhere abundantly clear.

While not wishing to discredit the practises of other Christian groups I would have to say again that baptism which is not accompanied by faith in Christ, expressed by the candidates themselves, is not the baptism of the bible.

Baptism without faith is a fairly meaningless exercise.

But when it is accompanied by repentance toward God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ then it is so rich and full of meaning and symbolism and it is so exciting and dynamic.

As we respond in obedience to God, following the example of our Lord Jesus we declare that we belong to Him, that we will by His grace endeavour to live for Him, that we have been washed and cleansed by His precious blood.

We identify with Him in His death, burial and resurrection as we die to our former way of life and put on the new

We take our stand confessing that He is Lord of our lives. We become united and identify with each other as fellow members of His body and in turn God blesses us with His Spirit.

Wow it surely can’t get much better than that.

Finally in closing as we consider all these things that I’ve so inadequately scratched over this morning:   If you’ve not been baptised perhaps you’ve never thought all that much about it. Or maybe it has come before you many times and you’ve always put it aside.

Maybe you need to adopt the words of the Ethiopian when he said –Why shouldn’t I be baptised? The old version says – What doth hinder me to be baptised?

And we need to answer that before God. Maybe it just been a lack of commitment on our part or the fact that we have just believed and then drifted along.

Maybe it’s because of some baggage that we are carrying, fear of offending family or friends of another tradition.

Perhaps it just a fear of standing up in front of everyone.

Whatever it is, it’s not worth missing out on Baptism for.

It has been exciting to spend a few evenings recently with three young people whose lives God is at work in. They each have different stories to tell, they come from different backgrounds and experiences.

But they are united in the fact that they each want to be obedient to God and express their faith in Christ by going through the waters of baptism.

What doth hinder you from being baptised? If we wait till we have all the answers or feel we are good enough then it will never happen.

The only prerequisite for baptism is that we believe with all our heart.

We read that after the Eunuch and Philip came up out of the water, Philip was suddenly taken away but the eunuch went on his way rejoicing.

I trust that there may be someone here this morning who after taking that first step of obedience will go on their way rejoicing. And we as fellow members of Christ’s body will rejoice with you.

May God speak to someone here this morning and bless the step that they will take to His glory and His praise. Amen

(Note: I gratefully acknowledge much help in preparing this message from –‘Baptism, Belonging and Breaking Bread’ – Paul Beasley-Murray, BUGB 2010)

Aubrey writes, We had a wonderful baptismal service last Sunday with the three candidates and around 250 of a congregation including many un-churched.

140824_helicopter_memorial_1-550x366This picture, taken in August, shows Aubrey Jamieson – Superintendent of the Fishermen’s Mission in Lerwick speaking at a memorial service to mark the anniversary of the Sumburgh helicopter disaster. The crash of the Puma helicopter on 23 August 2013 claimed four lives.

One week on from A Different Drum, Haddon Willmer shares some thoughts on The Golden Rule

Elsewhere on the MBC website you can read a vivid report of a great evening’s entertainment with the Riding Lights Theatre Company. But surely the play was more than a recommendation of the Golden Rule, ‘do unto others as you would have them do to you’?

For more than two hours we sat inches away from people under the threat of imminent and likely physical death or challenged to make a life choice that involved letting one’s self die irrevocably.

The Golden Rule is sensible ‘give and take’ practice. We give in order to get. We give because it will help or oblige the other to give back in return.  It is easily understood. It makes sense even to small children and is a key stage in their socialisation. It cuts down grabbing. It leads us all to model good social practice, because it says to each of us, make your action a good example, so that if others do likewise, everyone will benefit.

The Golden Rule is wise guidance. Most of the time many people live well together because this Rule is respected even if it is not explicitly quoted. But some of the time, some of the people walk in the valley of the shadow of death. No one has guaranteed security that the ordinary ways of living well will not fall apart. When they do, it will be for us like living in Eyam, in 1665, with the plague killing the villagers one by one, remorselessly from day to day. They did not understand it. They could not stop it. They didn’t even know when it would burn itself out, as plagues often do, or what their individual chances of survival might be. Death defined their life situation. They could not run from Eyam, because the plague might already be in them.

No one could give them the help they really needed: stop the plague. Others might shun them or pray for them, but they still had to go through the valley without guarantee of escape.

Mompesson’s well, Eyam

The drama shocked us out of our comfortable normality, because we live from day to day without being really in the valley of the shadow of death. Where we are, the Golden Rule works well enough. But the people in the play found a different rule to live by. They had to if they were not to fall into a black hole of despair and nothingness. They transcended ‘give and take’ and got nearer to simply giving. The villagers decided to seal themselves up with death in Eyam in order to do what they could to stop the plague spreading others. And they did it in faith and obedience to God in Christ, who is more than the teacher of the Golden Rule. He is leader in sacrificial giving, in loving even when he is not loved in return. Beyond the Golden Rule, is the prayer of St Ignatius Loyola  (1491-1556):

St Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556)

Teach us, good Lord, to serve you as you deserve;

to give and not to count the cost;

to fight and not to heed the wounds;

to toil and not to seek for rest;

to labour and not to ask for any reward,

save that of knowing that we do your will.

This is not an unproblematic prayer; it is in danger of being too tough, demanding and heroic.  But the last two lines are authentic following of Jesus and they point to a way and a wisdom which differs from the Golden Rule. They pray for freedom from the expectation of reciprocity and reward and so they empower people for situations where there is no earthly everyday reward for doing good.

As the plague fell upon them, so that every house was filled with anxiety or sorrow, all that was left to  the villagers was the perhaps wavering knowledge that they were doing God’s will – it was no good asking for any reward because they were staring death in the face.

So it was, in different ways, for the other stories told in the play.

The monks of the Notre Dame de L’Atlas Monastery

Some could see death coming to them, and they accepted it with their eyes open, in fellowship with God and in solidarity with others. The monks of the Notre Dame de L’Atlas Monastery in Algeria  refused to give up living with their Muslim neighbours who had become their friends and with whom they learnt to pray,  although the civil war between the Algerian army and the Armed Islamic Group got ever closer and more dangerous to foreigners and Christians. They were slaughtered.

For Katie Davis, there was no threat of  physical death, but a call to choose a way of life and a commitment to people which involved dying to self.

Katie Davis in Uganda

Katie’s parents thought she was throwing her life away when she stayed in Uganda, rather than come home and get on with her education, having done ten months there. Her boyfriend thought she had done her bit, enough to get it out of her system, but she was caught for life. What held her? Orphaned children who wanted a Mom, not just institutional care. They latched on to her. And God held her: “I think that’s definitely something that I was made for,” said Davis, 22, a devout Christian who idolizes Mother Teresa. “God just designed me that way because he already knew that this is what the plan was for my life — even though I didn’t.”

All these people did indeed practice the Golden Rule. They do not speak against it.  But I think they say there is and must be something more, something more difficult to explain and more difficult to practice and yet essential for human beings who are called to accompany and image God in the world. Their stories do not show that the Golden Rule is ‘the single most important thing in life’. I think that Jesus inspired them with something more than the Golden Rule.

Jonah 4 and I Corinthians 13

[Jonah Awaits the Destruction of Nineveh – copyright Trenét Worlds]

What do we get from Jonah?

If I preach to the Ninevites so they turn from their sin
If I pray from the depths in the most spiritual language
If I give my body to be thrown into the depths to save drowning sailors
And have not love – I am nothing

I am nothing because I am far from God
I do not know him in his works or his spirit
I do not share his mission
I preach his word powerfully to others but I do not hear it for myself
I resist God’s arguments with me to the end
It is not clear what will become of me, but so far as the story goes,
I am nothing

I am angry where God is patient
I want destruction while God wants reconstruction
I see they need to be converted but I do not want them to be converted
I see they need to be converted but I cannot see that I need to be converted
I see and make enemies while God values and is faithful to all his creatures
I think I am special and am not content to be like other of God’s creatures
I am privileged because God keeps on talking to me
But I am nothing because I do not get what keeps God going

I care about my comfort under the gourd;
The value it has for me is measured by my loss when it withers in the sun
But still it is a puzzle to me why God should value the children
And all the cows in Nineveh:
I have no sympathy for God when he contemplates losing his creatures.

I think out of my anger and disdain and go away from God
I pray but what do my prayers mean?
I am godly, unlike the Ninevites, and all the others I look down upon,
But in my godliness, I am godless and I don’t know it
Indeed I think in my pride my way is better than God’s

I am without God because I am without love
If I have not love, I am nothing

For God is love

Haddon Willmer

A film to see, a song to sing

The film, Lilies of the Field (1963) is fascinating, beautiful, simple. It could be argued it is like the Sermon on the Mount, too good and too hopeful to be true. Or maybe it has the truth of whatever is good, for the really good always verges on the too good to be true. The people in the story are not goody-goody cut-outs. Some are proud, some selfishly calculating, some naïve, some sceptical, some awkward, but their faults are subsumed into an abounding grace which comes upon them all. The grace is what makes the whole story, in a strange, unexpected way; grace comes to light in the making of the story. People make their various limited contributions to the happening, with varying degrees of willingness; some work and suffer considerably to make it happen; but at the end of the story, when the work is done and stands there as an abiding and worthy achievement, none of them can claim credit for it.

I have told you the story without telling you anything, so I have not spoilt your entertainment. It really is a good film to watch – for all ages.

I had never heard Jester Hairston’s song, Amen, which we hear twice in the film. You can see Hairston singing it here on YouTube.

It is a great telling of the story of Jesus.
Hairston was a remarkable man – see this link on Wikipedia

God troubles Job

Why do the innocent suffer?  That is one question running through the book of Job.  Job was a good and prosperous man, who lost his family, property and health in sudden disasters.   Some tried to argue that the good do not suffer, so there must have been something wrong with Job to cause his troubles.  Job does not accept that and complains about a world that is unjust, where the wicked prosper, get bonus after bonus, and are never called to account.  His advisers argue there is justice in the long run – for example, if the wicked man gets away with it, his sons will cop it.  Job is not satisfied with that answer.

Job 21.19  ‘You say, God stores up their iniquity for their sons.  Let him recompense it to themselves that they may know it.’   Job wants the wicked to suffer appropriately, and to have to pay up, so that they have to acknowledge and feel the wrong they have done.

Job has a strong sense of the individual before God.   So he looks for God’s wrath to be directed in justice to the precise places where it is deserved.

But that is not the heart and source of his view.  His prime concern is not that the wicked should be punished.  He is wrestling with his own situation.

He knows he is innocent or better, righteous.  He will maintain that.

But he knows that in his trouble, it is God he is facing.   He cannot stand outside his trouble, so that he is free to ask, ‘Why should God allow this, or do this to me?’   He does not say, ‘I have troubles, God is responsible, how can God justify himself?’

He rather says,  ‘My bodily troubles are bad and depressing in the extreme, but they are not my real problem.   It is rather that troubled as I am, I am before God.  God comes to me in my troubles, so he is the troubler.  In my troubles, I get no peace, no comfort.  They are the form of God to me: he does not let me alone.  Troubled as I am, I cannot say, ‘This is merely an accidental, earthly, animal occurrence, it has no personal or spiritual meaning, so my spirit can serenely rise above the suffering to be with God.’

‘No, God is after me’, says Job, ‘he will not leave me alone’.   ‘In God’s hand is the life of every living thing and the breath of all mankind’  12.10.   This general truth is emphasised and illustrated extensively in the book of Job.  Job’s trouble is a  particular occurrence of this general truth, the way it works out for him.   There is no escape from God.   You think that is comforting news?  For Joh, it seemed to mean trouble with little hope of light and peace.  Job sometimes says he wants to speak with the Almighty and argue his case with him (13.3) but at other times, Job thinks the only hope is for God to leave him alone, so that he can find a few days of brightening up, before he goes ‘whence he will not return, to the land of gloom and deep darkness’ 10 20-22.    (This is one reason why even many religious people give up on God: they sense that God might come for us, as he came for Job.   We would like to make our case to God, to speak frankly with God and call God to account, but we do not have the freedom to do that.  Before we can speak with God, God must take the pressure off.  So Job sets out the conditions under which he will talk with God: ‘Withdraw your hand from me and let not dread of thee terrify me.  Then call and I will answer…’ 13.20-22.  But sometimes, God does not leave some people alone, to get on with their life without his hand on them in a troubling way.  7.11-21: why does God make so much of human being, visiting him every morning?   ‘Will you never take your eyes off me long enough for me to swallow my spittle?’)

It is on this basis that Job appeals to his friends, who torment him with their words  19.1  They should not do this.  They should understand that even if he has done wrong, his error remains with himself – 19.4.   They should leave him alone with his responsibility and not interfere, as though they can make themselves great by humiliating him  19.5.

This is a form of the argument of Romans 12.19-20, Lev.19.17-18: Leave vengeance to God and do not interfere or try to do God’s work for him Romans 14.4.   A major issue here is knowing how to practise this wisely: for there has to be some sort of judging enacted in society by human beings.   We tend now in our secular society to ignore God altogether, and so to make social, ie state judgment final and complete.  But it is still the same as it always has been:  the human enactment of justice is often incomplete and cannot be counted as final; it leaves the victim unsatisfied, so that they have to find some other help in moving on with their lives; it is often clumsy and mistaken, and does not do redemptive justice to the wrongdoer; and when it escalates its own cruelty in order to match the heinousness of the crime it strays from the service to humanity which is the basis of its authority.

So we need human judging, but it needs to act with humility within limits.  That is what Job asks his friends  to exercise: not to magnify themselves by being haughty assured critics who humiliate him.   Job does not pursue this argument by pointing out the limits of human justice (as I have done in the last paragraph) and asking his friends to limit themselves.  Human beings, especially once they are on their high horse, are not very good at limiting themselves.  Rather Job calls God into the argument.

He does not call God into the argument to defend him against his critics (God at the end of the book 42.7 appears like that) but rather Job asks them to limit their own critical humiliating endeavours  by taking note of God in the situation.  ‘Know then that God has put me in the wrong and closed his net about me’  19.6.   They can see Job is in trouble, and so they speak down to him, diagnosing his trouble and advising him – and all the time, they have not noticed or taken the measure of the most significant thing about Job’s trouble: God is there, not indeed as his helper or comfort but as the one who has ‘put him in the wrong’.

We should not think ourselves superior to Job’s friends for most of the time, we are not very good at noticing when God is there putting people in trouble.  Indeed good kind Christians today are as bad as other good people at not being able to imagine or feel that when people are in trouble,  they have been targeted by God and that the trouble is not to be understood except as the manner and the place of God’s coming close.   It is a terrible thing to think;  it is a dangerous way to think about people’s troubles.  Indeed part of the lesson of Job is that we should hesitate to interpret anyone else’s troubles in these terms.  But the other part of the lesson of Job is that as a human being I,  for myself, may, in the course of life, be led into troubles, and that as I live through the trouble, I discover that at its heart or alongside it, God is putting me in the wrong.   Then God becomes my real trouble.

Because Job’s friends could not interpret Job’s troubles in this way without putting themselves in the wrong, it is right that pastoral practice and spiritual direction in church does not work in these terms.   Our pastoral practice assures people that God is with them and for them;  it does not talk of God putting you in the wrong.   But it is one of the limits of the best pastoral practice that there are things it cannot and dare not say.   Job’s friends simply have to keep quiet.  Yet Job in trouble cannot be comforted with the one-sided cheerful pastoring.  Job has been picked out by God and there are dark places he must walk through, because God has  ‘walled up his way’  19.8.   The church that may not pastor in these terms can, at least, read Job, which most churches never do these days.   Without pointing the finger or interfering with other people’s relation with God, reading Job would cause us to be sensitive to strange but pressing dimensions of human living with God.   It would mean that as a community we did not build and promote a culture which blocks out the discoveries the righteous man Job made when God put him in the wrong.   Reading Job might help us to know better what we are given in Jesus Christ, who in his dying, cried out, My God, My God, why have you forsaken me?

Jesus took those words from Psalm 22, a very Job-like Psalm.  What it is to be abandoned, Job describes in 19.13-20.  His family and friends have turned against him – even young children despise him.  All that is the form and measure of his trouble.  Job asks his advisers who magnify themselves and humiliate him to notice his abandonment.   He asks them not to analyse his problem and tell him how to behave, but simply to ‘have pity on me, o you my friends’ 19.21.    Why should they have pity on him?  Because they want to be better than all his other friends, who have left him?  Because they remember they too are sensitive human beings and they would not like this to happen to them – Do as you would be done by?   These good reasons for decent behaviour are not what Job points them to. They should have pity on him, ‘because the hand of God has touched me.’

He brings them back to the key point:  Job’s trouble is with God.  It does not follow that his friends must help him to put right his relation with God.  Job’s relation with God has gone into territory where they have evidently never been.  And in any case, if God is touching Job it is not for them to interfere.   So Job asks. ‘Why do you, like God, pursue me?’  19.22.   Do you think God needs some assistance?   Do you want to get on winning side?’     No:  if you see the hand of God touching someone, know that it is not your business to pursue them.  You will add to their troubles, but you will not be doing the work of God.   Have pity.  Stay with them in silence.  Maybe you will get close to Job in his trouble and find yourself in trouble with God.

Reading the riots: a NEET question comes home

Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, writes in The Guardian  today:

The big question Reading the Riots leaves us with is whether, in our current fretful state, with unavoidable austerity ahead, we have the energy to invest what’s needed in family and neighbourhood and school to rescue those who think they have nothing to lose. We have to persuade them, simply, that we as government and civil society alike will put some intelligence and skill into giving them the stake they do not have. Without this, we shall face more outbreaks of futile anarchy, in which we shall all, young and old, be the losers. 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/dec/05/riots-return-young-archbishop-canterbury

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/dec/05/reading-riots-nothing-to-lose

We are also reminded that

In the aftermath of the August riots, the prime minister, David Cameron, was quick to dismiss the idea that poverty was a factor in the disorder. “These riots were not about poverty,” he said. “That insults the millions of people who, whatever the hardship, would never dream of making others suffer like this.”

This is a mistaken interpretation.  It is true that many people who are poor did not riot; many of them would not riot and loot even if the opportunity came near to them.  But that does not mean that poverty did not have a major effect on some people, leading them to riot or steal, at least opportunistically.  

This is where we need more sensitive analyses and descriptions, such as those coming out of the Reading the Riots study (http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/series/reading-the-riots) which the Archbishop comments on. 

Different people react to any particular situation in different ways.  

We need to understand why some people respond to difficult circumstances in unhelpful or bad ways, and then out of that understanding, we can see how to help them and how to change the circumstances for the future.  That is the argument and the spirit of the Archbishop’s article. 

The big question….for us, the church

‘The big question Reading the Riots leaves us with is whether, in our current fretful state, with unavoidable austerity ahead, we have the energy to invest what’s needed in family and neighbourhood and school to rescue those who think they have nothing to lose.’  

Church is not mentioned  by name, but it belongs here.   The church is a local centre of some visible social energy: people come together to make a sort of community.  And the church claims that the heart of its own heart is the energy of God in Christ by the Spirit.   

So the big question comes home to us, the church: have we ‘the energy to invest what’s needed…to rescue those who think they have nothing to lose’? 

Who have nothing to lose?

When we talk about ‘those who think they have nothing to lose’ we are talking about many more than those who rioted or might riot.  There are

‘people who have vague but strong longings for something like secure employment, and no idea where to look for it; who on the whole want to belong, and live in a climate where they are taken seriously as workers, as citizens – and as needy individuals; and who have got used to being pushed to the margins and told that they are dispensable’.

How many have ‘lives in which anger and depression are almost the default setting, thanks to a range of frustrations and humiliations’?  

There are many, ‘in our current fretful state, with unavoidable austerity ahead’.  

There are, for example,  a record number of NEETs –  16- to 24-year-olds not in education, work or training in England.    There are now  nearly 1.2 million, 15.6% of this age group.   http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/feb/24/neets-statistics#data

Do you know what it is like to be a NEET, not by choice, but out of disadvantage, finding no door to life open, applying for jobs and never getting one, having the dreams of childhood stripped of all chance of realisation?   Have you ever got close enough to a NEET to begin to see. 

What happens to a NEET who is older than 24?  They have got used to a life where they count for very little, and now they cease to be counted in this statistic.  They join many other young people, who may have a job of some sort, but see no chance of ever getting their own home, what with the shortage of housing and the cost of mortgages.   They are not all disadvantaged from early years – many have degrees – but,  in their early adulthood, they are together as those who look towards the future and see more than austerity ahead.  It is more like sterility, existing but not living.   

Here is a big question that comes home to us as church.   Do we hear it?   Do we have the love and respect to hear it?  Do we have the energy to invest?   It is a searching question which may find us out uncomfortably.

Life options in Gethsemane

When they came to arrest Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane, one of the disciples drew his sword and struck the slave of the high priest and cut off his ear.
Then Jesus said to him:
“Put your sword back into its place; for all who take the sword shall perish by the sword.
“Do you not think that I cannot appeal to my Father, and he will at once send me more than twelve legions of angels?
“But how then should the Scriptures be fulfilled, that it must be so?”
 

Matthew 27. 52-54

Jesus the way-finder

All through the Gospel story, we can see Jesus finding his distinctive way, discerning and doing his Father’s will.    

It is not an obvious path.  Jesus calls us to go a narrow way, which is hard to find (Matt 7.14).  He could call us to find it, even though it was not easy, because he was already living in that way,  always looking for it, always learning, always daring it. So it was in the desert when he was tempted  (Matt.4.1-11).  He considered the options which might fit the task he had been given in life: to live as the beloved Son of the Father, proclaiming the coming of the kingdom of God, fulfilling all righteousness from one situation to another in a fast-moving history (Matt.3.13-17). He turned down Satan’s obvious common-sense ways to achieve his goals for God.  He found other ways, unlikely ways, hard ways.    

All through his life he was choosing narrow ways, and inviting others to go with him. 

At the end, in the Garden of Gethsemane,  it is still the same.

Option One: the Sword

One obvious commonsense response to the gang who came to arrest him was the Sword.  

So one of his disciples thought: Kill your enemy – if you miss his head, you may still get his ear.  At least, you will have done something.    

This is the way we all follow most of the time. In some countries many people have their own guns, for self-protection. In this country, we shun personal firearms, but we live within a public order guarded on occasion by armed officers. We find it hard to imagine how we could cope without the sanction of force as the final resort.  

Jesus said: All who take the sword shall perish by the sword.   Does this mean all use the sword will, sooner or later, be killed by the sword?  Using the sword does not have to lead to unlimited killing, though there is always a danger that it will.  The truth in this word of Jesus, and the wisdom of it, does not depend on whether the sword gets turned back on every user or that every bomber is hoist with his own petard. As Jesus saw it, walking on the narrow way, to use the sword implies  relying on it to solve problems. Those who trust in the sword find that it defines the possibilities open to them, shaping their values and vision. Those who take the sword find themselves limited by it. 

We know what this limitation is in practice as we reflect on our engagement in Afghanistan.   We engaged there because some good needed  to be done, so we thought. We had military power so we put it to work.  And then, somewhere along the road, it dawns on us that there is no military solution to the tangle we have got ourselves into – we must be working for a political way forward.  We have to use soft power. It is a matter of hearts and minds, and they cannot be shaped by the sword. 

And now we seem to have the same problem in Libya.  Everyone, and certainly the British government, is in danger of being limited by its vision of the problem, expecting the civil war to be won militarily by the right side (the rebels, not Gaddafi, who, we say,  must go, because there is no place for him in the future).  But it may be a long time before the disorganised rebels get near to winning, and along the way, wounds will be opened that may bleed for a long time.   We need more than the sword in our  imaginary and practical armoury. 

Gethsemane is a great clarifying moment in the mission of Jesus, and very instructive for all of us who want to be his disciples. So Jesus in this mortal crisis enlightens us with his wisdom, which comes from his own living.  Lethal force tempts us to think we have the decisive solution to problems in our hands – but it does not work as we would like it to.  It is wise then to consider other options. 

Option Two:  Angels

If the sword is put back in its place, what other way is there – in tight corners like Gethsemane?

Ask the Father:  pray for twelve legions of angels.  That will see off the high priest’s minions – it would dispose of the Roman army too.  This is divine power in miracle, in answer to prayer. And Jesus says No to this option too.  

Good believer, does that not seem strange and upsetting to you?   Are we not called to pray with faith, and so to move mountains?  

We accept Jesus’ saying No to the sword, but can we go with him when he says No to heavenly miracle?    This is a blow to lively, adventurous Christianity. It is a discouragement to faith. But if we are determined to solve life’s problems by having the twelve legions of angels riding to take us out of Gethsemane,  we will not be going forward with Jesus. If we must not take the sword, lest our whole being gets imprisoned in reliance on deadly force, we should be careful about praying in ways that value God because his deadly force is much more than ours could ever be.  Both ways, the victory is handed to deadly force, not the life of love, and the love of life. 

Option three:  being fully human in God’s way

But what third way can there be?  

The sword is practical, even if destructive.  Trusting God for miracle is conceivable.  But a third way – can we see it?   The gate to it is not only narrow but disguised.

It is indeed disguised in God’s becoming human.  

Jesus in the desert refused any power Satan could give him to achieve his mission.  So now, he declines to ask the Father for the miracle of twelve legions.  He holds on to what he has been given in life, what he has discovered in learning: it is necessary for the Scripture to be fulfilled and his life takes its shape in serving that fulfilling. Jesus was dedicated to doing God’s will in God’s way.   

Does this mean that God had a detailed plan, which had to be followed to the letter?

And did Jesus know this plan, because he could read the cryptic clues which were scattered through the Scriptures? Did Jesus live by the book in this way?  Is that the view of Jesus you get from reading the Gospels? If the Bible has cryptic clues laid down long before the event, and then Jesus lives a life which fits into them, that looks like a miracle.  Quite a few people think of it like that. They read the Bible to decipher the clues and they believe in Jesus because what happened to him fits what was apparently foretold.  

If this is how it is, we do not have a third option here – we have a variant on the miracle of the legions of angels. (Note that Jesus does not deny miracle – he just says it is not the way for him or for us in the present world, in Gethsemane. By declining to go this way, he must look for a third option, and commits us to doing the same.)

The third option is not to get a miracle, to take one out of the tight corner or to give fatalistic assurance of being right. The third option is so narrow and hard it makes Gethsemane unbearable.  Jesus prayed with blood and tears to see it and to get going on it. This option is to go on and go through with the human life given to him, in the place and time where it is given.

Living human life, loving God with all our heart and soul and mind and strength, and our neighbour as ourselves, is what we are called to in the Scriptures. All the commands of God, given us in Scripture, are summed up in this commandment to love.  It commits us to living from the beginning to the end of life in a particular spirit.  The Scripture tells us that God gives us life in human form and it is in living human lives  that we glorify and thank God, offering to God as a living sacrifice  the whole being that we have in and with our bodies (Romans 12.1,2).   Often, in this life in the body, this life on earth, great, joyful and surprising gifts are given us, and we find the language of miracle is just what we need to describe what we have met on the way.   Often too, life is narrow and threatens to close down altogether:  then,  Jesus says,  we will go on with God and not be tempted by either sword or miracle.   And Jesus does all he can to guard us from doing anything else: Put up your sword, he says – and heals the poor servant’s ear.  And lets himself be taken.  

Jesus is God’s way of being fully human, from beginning to end.  The good news is that Jesus shares and opens up God’s way of being human, so that we too may become fully human. Jesus opens, and keeps open, that way of being human even when we are in Gethsemane, when we are invited to be watching with him, but can only ‘sleep for sorrow’ (Luke 22.45).  

Jesus keeps open the way by being himself, to the end.  He is the Way – our way is with him and in him.   He is here for us still, the One who kept to God’s way of being human, even in Gethsemane and Golgotha, is the Same who is eternally our Brother, Guide and Path. 

Jesus keeps open the way for us, in the crisis of pain, fear and loss, by refusing the sword and  by declining miracles, for both tend to exempt us from being faithful to our calling and his, to live in God’s humanity.

Dietrich Bonhoeffer died 9 April 1945: Salt and Light in the world

How this sermon came my way

Fifty years ago, as a student in Cambridge, I met David Wilcox in the Robert Hall Society, where Baptist students gathered. After Cambridge, David was a Baptist minister for many years, before becoming an Anglican. Last September we met again in Cambridge at a reunion for people who had been in Robert Hall Society around 1960. I found out he was now Priest Vicar at Wells Cathedral, a long way from Leeds. So I did not expect to have more contact with him.

A bit later, I got a phone call from my brother-in-law, Spencer. He goes to Wells Cathedral quite often as he used to go with his wife, Joy, until she died last year. He met David and they got talking and found they both know me. Spencer then sent me a copy of this sermon preached by David earlier this year.

Wells Cathedral
height=”500″ Wells Cathedral by Luke Piper

Three ways in which this sermon is good

It is good in at least three ways.

First,  it is beautifully crafted, so that it is clear, short, full of stuff, and to the point. The craft makes it memorable, which is important if a sermon is to go deep and stay with us and be fruitful. The craft which makes it memorable is in the simplicity of its structure, the motifs of light and salt running all the way through.

Secondly, we hear Jesus in this sermon, calling us to be salt and light.

Thirdly, what it is to be salt and light in the world is illustrated from the life of Dietrich Bonhoeffer.

Eberhard Bethge, Bonhoeffer’s friend, wrote a huge richly informative biography, nearly a thousand pages long. But here we have the life in two pages, not long enough for anyone to get weary, even if they are sitting uncomfortably on cathedral seats. As a brief account of Bonhoeffer’s life and witness I think this is quite outstanding – it does not merely outline the history but makes it a challenge and encouragement for us today.

Why hear this now?

On 9 April 1945, at Flossenburg concentration camp, Bonhoeffer was hanged for his share in the resistance to Hitler. So this week it is fitting to publish it, to remember him, and to hear again for ourselves on our 9 April 2011 the call to be salt and light in the world.

Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Sermon preached by David Wilcox at the 9.45 Eucharist in Wells Cathedral on Sunday 6th February, 2011

Today is an ordinary Sunday. Last Wednesday was Candlemas, and at Evensong we said “Goodbye” to the festival season of Christmas and Epiphany. For the next five or so weeks we journey through Ordinary Time until we reach Ash Wednesday.

But, on this ordinary Sunday, we hear extraordinary words addressed to extraordinary people. “You are the salt of the earth. You are the light of the world”. The “you” is emphatic. A finger is being pointed. “You, who are listening to me, you are salt, you are light.”

So who are these people? The introduction to today’s Gospel reading tells us that they are disciples of Jesus of Nazareth who have joined him on a mountain. We are hearing part of the Sermon on the Mount. What we aren’t told is that Jesus has just declared these followers of his blessed by God.,- blessed , not because they are rich, happy or or successful, but blessed because they are poor in spirit and meek; blessed because they mourn over the injustice and wrong in the world and hunger and thirst to see righteousness prevail; blessed because they are merciful, peacemakers; blessed because they are totally committed and ready to stand up for what is right, even if it means suffering and persecution. In one sense they are the ordinary people of Galilee. But in another sense they are extra-ordinary, because they have been seized by Jesus’ vision of God’s realm of justice and peace, healing and reconciliation, and with him they want to make it real. They are beatitude people.

Behind this group of Jesus’ followers on the mountain stands another, the church community for whom the person we call Matthew wrote this gospel. Jesus’ words address them. To them he says, “You”. And behind them are more and yet more, generation upon generation of people, young and old, right down to today. All over the world you will find them, in Cairo’s Tahrir Square, in the ruins of Port-au- Prince, in the crowded streets of Seoul.

And amongst that vast crowd we too are numbered, here in this cathedral church. We ordinary people, yet extra-ordinary in our passion for justice in our country and around the world, for peace and reconciliation between fractured communities and nations, for the welfare of the whole web of life on this fragile planet, we are the people whom Jesus addresses this morning. “You are the salt of the earth. You are the light of the world.”

Notice, “You are”, not “You ought to be”. This is the essence of your being as beatitude people. And notice, “Salt of the earth, light of the world.” This is not about religious escapism, but about getting stuck into the nitty-gritty of the world in which we live.

So what does it mean to be salt, to be light?

Salt,- tiny crystals. Dissolve them in water and the flavour is transformed. Soak fish or meat in brine and it keeps for months. Salt makes a difference, hidden but real. And that is what you are; people who transform the world from within, by your presence where help is needed, by the way you handle relationships, by your readiness to take constructive action without anyone else knowing about it. Of course sodium chloride can’t lose its taste. But two thousand years ago it was easily confused with gypsum and came mixed with impurities,. That points to the danger, that we melt so imperceptibly into the world around us that we stop making a difference. We are called to add the savour of the beatitudes to human relationships, and to help preserve what is good and right and fair. Salt.

And light,– a flickering candle flame. But place it prominently in a darkened room and it will shed its light to the furthest corners. If the picture of salt is about working imperceptibly from within, then the picture of light is about being visible, not hiding our light under a bushel basket but speaking and acting clearly for truth and righteousness and peace. A letter to government official about a prisoner of conscience, an event to promote the welfare of impoverished people, a peaceful demonstration against injustice or oppression, for reconciliation or the well-being of the earth; these are ways in which you add your candle flame to those of others and make a difference. Light.

Eighty years ago, in 1931, a 25 year old student discovered the Sermon on the Mount. His name was Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and when I read today’s Gospel I immediately thought of him. He had just qualified as a university lecturer, and now he was on a year’s scholarship at Union Theological Seminary, New York. He became friends with a fellow student, Jean Lassere. Remember, this was just a dozen years after the end of the first world war. Lassere was a convinced .pacifist, and he encouraged Bonhoeffer to explore the Sermon on the Mount and reflect on what it meant to be a disciple of Jesus. Another friend he made in New York was Frank Fisher, who introduced him to a black Baptist church. It became his spiritual home, and he took a Sunday School class. Salt. The urban black scene of deprivation and struggle stirred him deeply. He would walk out of a cafe if it refused to serve his black friend. Light.

Bonhoeffer returned home with a stack of records of spirituals in his trunk, and a determination to continue living out the Sermon on the Mount. As well as lecturing at the university he became chaplain of a technical college. He also took over a confirmation class in a slum area of the city, moving into a flat there for a while and taking the youngsters to a hut he owned in the country. Salt. Soon after Hitler came to power in 1933 he gave a radio talk warning of the dangers of a Fuhrer who becomes an idol of the people. Light. The next month, when an official boycott of Jewish shops began, he presented a paper to the church authorities on possible responses to the Jewish question including, if necessary, “putting a spoke in the wheel” of state activity. Light. In the summer he campaigned vigorously against the demand of those called German Christians that people of Jewish origin be excluded from the church. Light.

Exhausted, he came to London in the autumn to look after two German congregations, but continued to advocate the cause of what became known as the Confessing Church, and he worked tirelessly for refugees from Germany. Salt. He returned to Germany in the spring of 1935 to take charge of an illegal seminary for ordinands. When the Gestapo closed it in 1937 it continued in a clandestine way. The lectures he gave there were published as “Discipleship” and “Life Together”. One section of “Discipleship” unpacks the Sermon on the Mount. “The disciples must not only think of heaven,” Bonhoeffer says of today’s gospel. “They have an earthly task as well …..A community of Jesus which seeks to hide itself has ceased to follow him.” Salt and Light.

In 1939 Bonhoeffer travelled to New York to become a lecturer there, in order to avoid conscription and to be an overseas link for the Confessing Church. But almost as soon as he arrived he decided he had made a mistake. In his letter of resignation he wrote, “Christians in Germany will face the terrible alternative of either willing the defeat of their nation in order that Christian civilisation may survive, or willing the victory of their nation and thereby destroying civilisation. I know which of those alternatives I must choose, but I cannot make it in safety.” Light.

So he returned home. Members of his family and friends had formed a resistance cell. He supported and encouraged them, and through them he was recruited as an agent of the Abwehr, the counter-intelligence agency. He used his visits abroad ostensibly to gather intelligence, but in reality to keep lines of communication open with church and political leaders in allied countries. Salt. He also helped with Operation 7 which enabled a number of Jews, recruited as agents, to travel to Switzerland and escape. Salt.

In April 1943 he was arrested because of suspicion that he was using his Abwehr service to avoid conscription, and because of Operation 7. He was held in Tegel military prison in Berlin, and his calmness and practical care during the air raids at the end of that year made him something of a hero amongst both warders and fellow prisoners. Salt. After the failure of a plot to assassinate Hitler on 20th July 1944 and the discovery of papers implicating him and his circle, he was transferred to the Gestapo cells in the centre of Berlin, then to Buchenwald, and finally to Flossenburg. On the night of April 8th, 1945 he and six fellow conspirators faced a court martial. The next morning, April 9th, he along with rest was hanged with prolonged barbarity. Light.

Bonhoeffer has been a source of inspiration to me for nearly fifty years. If you want to find out more, I commend the 100 page “SPCK Introduction to Bonhoeffer” by Keith Clements. As you follow Bonhoeffer’s story you realise that his way of living the Sermon on the Mount changed through the years. What it meant to be salt and light in 1941 was rather different to what it had been in 1931, and doubtless what it would have been in 1951 if he had survived the war. That is true for everyone. Being beatitude people in Wells today has a different complexion to what it was in pre-war or wartime Germany, or what it is in Cairo or Port-au-Prince or Seoul. What matters is that you and I work out what it means for us, here and now. “You are the salt of the earth. You are the light of the world.” Today on this ordinary Sunday, through the days of this coming ordinary week, through the weeks and years that are left to you, be the extraordinary people that you are.

PHP Code Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com